Clickable Culture   Official Research Blog of Phantom Compass
  US Army Goes Massively Multiplayer  
 
 
Posted 2004-02-19 by Tony Walsh
 
 
     
 
Already using their America's Army computer game as a recruitment tool, the American Army is now looking at a massively-multiplayer environment for large-scale simulation and training. HomeLAN features an in-depth interview with Robert Gehorsam, Vice President of Strategic Initiatives at There, Inc. It turns out the people who brought you the shopping-friendly There.com can also bring you military training on a massive scale. Read Gehorsam's 2003 presentation "Massively Multiplayer Persistent Worlds: Entertainment or Training?" [ppt|html] for more of an inside look at this interesting project.
 
     
 
   
 
  ... share via email del.icio.us digg bloglines fark reddit newsvine simpy blogmarks magnolia  
  6 Comments  
 
   
 
Comment posted by gatmog
February 19, 2004 @ 12:55 pm
     
 
At first I thought it was cool that the US Army was getting into game development. Since most war shooters usually have a consultant brought on board to check accuracies, a game created by the people who actually plan these military missions would provide a lot more credibility.

However after reading about this Massively multiplayer project it seems like the beginnings of Ender's Game. The training of youth in "virtual" worlds with "virtual" enemies until one day there is no distinction.
 
     
 
     
   
 
Comment posted by Tony Walsh
February 19, 2004 @ 1:10 pm
     
 
Continuing the sci-fi angle:

Any army's ideal situation is to fight an entire war with killing machines-- literally. If they could build robots that were as agile as videogame characters, 12-year-olds would be fighting our wars from their living rooms.

DARPA is trying to go this direction, but the "problem" is that human bodies are much cheaper to build, equip, and deploy than robots. Current military robots and drones are used where it is basically impossible for a human to do the job, such as mine removal, surveillance, or guided bombs.

In addition to prohibitive costs, the more complex a machine is, the easier it is to break. Look at all the Mars-related robot failures. It's going to be ages and ages before idiot-proof, robust military robots will be in regular service. I mean, one good EMP bomb, and it's all over.

Then there's always a good chance that robots will be captured by the enemy. Top-secret US military hardware has been captured before, usually as the result of a systems failure or being shot down. A wounded human is just a prisoner of war-- sure you might be able to get some intelligence out of him, but that's about it. A captured robot can be reverse-engineered.
 
     
 
     
   
 
Comment posted by Yermum
February 19, 2004 @ 4:36 pm
     
 
What they should do is create an environment that accounts for the possibility of guerrilas or insurgent forces who pose an asymmetrical threat creating home made bombs etc.

A more sophisticated Counter Strike.

They might be able to learn a lot from the creativity players bring to blowing their asses up and devise strategies to account for it.
 
     
 
     
   
 
Comment posted by Tony Walsh
February 19, 2004 @ 4:44 pm
     
 
If they want to do their job right, they will indeed do this :) They could learn a lot from Counter-Strike and FPS players, to be honest.

If they really wanted to be smart about it, they'd recruit some of the top gaming clans to play opposition forces. The best FPS players out there use sneaky, dirty, and surprising tactics. I bet the real soldiers would get whupped... would give them something to think about anyway.

One of the many goofy things about this simulation, of course, is the total lack of horror involved. Sure you can emote, but can you emote trying to hold in what's left of your intestines while a massive pool of blood gets into your boots?
 
     
 
     
   
 
Comment posted by Yermum
February 19, 2004 @ 5:36 pm
     
 
Yeah. And more to the point can you function under fire while trying to hold in what's left of your friend's intestines while a massive pool of his blood gets into your boots.

 
     
 
     
   
 
Comment posted by Tony Walsh
February 19, 2004 @ 5:37 pm
     
 
Hah! True, dat.
 
     
 
     
   
 
 
     
 
     
[ Detailed Search ]
Clickable Conversation
5224 comments
on 4159 entries

Dinozoiks wrote:
Wow! Thanks for that Tony. Just posted a bunch of other tips here... http://www.dino.co.uk/labs/2008/45-tips-when-designing-online-content-for-kids/ Hope it helps someone... Dino...
in Dino Burbidge's '10 Things To Remember When Designing For Kids Online'


yes, many of the free little games are crappy. but as an artist who has recently published free content on the itunes app store,…
in Free iPhone Games Are Awful: Strategy?


I vote for popup radial menus. Highlight a bit of text, the push and hold, Sims-style radial menu pops up with Copy, Paste, etc....
in More iPhone Gestures, Please


Hey Tony! A client of mine is looking to hire an internal Flash game dev team to build at a really cool Flash CCG…
in Dipping Into Toronto's Flash Pool


Yeah, there's a lot of weird common sense things I've noticed they've just omitted from the design. No idea why though....
in More iPhone Gestures, Please


It also bears noting there's no mechanism right now for a developer to offer a free trial for the iPhone; the App Store isn't…
in Free iPhone Games Are Awful: Strategy?


@GeorgeR: It's on my shopping list :) I've heard good things about it as well. And Cro Mag Rally. @andrhia: meh, I don't know…
in Free iPhone Games Are Awful: Strategy?


...you get what you pay for, you know? I actually bought Trism based on early buzz, and it's truly a novel mechanic. I've been…
in Free iPhone Games Are Awful: Strategy?


The only one I've heard good things about is Super Monkey Ball. Have you given that a whirl yet?...
in Free iPhone Games Are Awful: Strategy?


Advance warning: this frivolent comment is NOT RELATED or even worth your time ... But whenever i hear "Collada", i think of that SCTV…
in Electric Sheep Builds Its Own Flock


Clickable Culture Feeds:

RSS 2.0 ATOM 1.0 ALL

Accessibility:

TEXT

Clickable Culture
Copyright (c)1999-2007 in whole or in part Tony Walsh.

Trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments owned by the Poster. Shop as usual, and avoid panic buying.